(MattG: A great FanPost that deserves to be bumped up to the front page.)
via d3b4lt1s53xf6k.cloudfront.net
A comment I made in response to one of MattG's posts got me thinking - always a dangerous proposition. How many of the horses we may see in the Derby have faced anything similar to the kind of pace most of us expect for the race? Below is a chart I have compiled showing the last three races for each contender. This information comes from the BRIS program, which I no longer feel comfortable handicapping without. One of the things I like about it is that it shows how many points above or below par each of a horse's races was run. (One of the things I wish it showed was the race's shape!) 0 is normal, while negative numbers indicate a slow pace, and positive numbers a hot one. I have bolded the above-par numbers.
|
Horse Name |
1st Call Race Par |
2nd Call Race Par |
Horse Finish |
|
American Lion |
-13 |
-6 |
1st |
|
|
-1 |
-2 |
4th |
|
|
-4 |
-3 |
3rd |
|
Awesome Act |
-12 |
-11 |
3rd |
|
|
+10 |
+3 |
1st |
|
|
-9 |
-10 |
4th |
|
Backtalk |
-13 |
-6 |
3rd |
|
|
-14 |
-7 |
1st |
|
|
+2 |
+4 |
8th |
|
Conveyance |
-3 |
-1 |
2nd |
|
|
+7 |
+9 |
1st |
|
|
-4 |
-2 |
1st |
|
Dean’s Kitten |
-2 |
-6 |
1st |
|
|
+6 |
+3 |
2nd |
|
|
-16 |
-17 |
4th |
|
Discreetly Mine |
+1 |
+2 |
4th |
|
|
-8 |
-4 |
1st |
|
|
-1 |
-3 |
4th |
|
Dublin |
+4 |
+4 |
3rd |
|
|
-6 |
-5 |
3rd |
|
|
+7 |
+9 |
2nd |
|
Endorsement |
-3 |
-1 |
1st |
|
|
-13 |
-11 |
1st |
|
|
-12 |
-13 |
2nd |
|
Eskendereya |
-12 |
-11 |
1st |
|
|
-11 |
-14 |
1st |
|
|
-16 |
-8 |
1st |
|
Homeboykris |
-22 |
-18 |
2nd |
|
|
-1 |
+6 |
5th |
|
|
+7 |
+8 |
5th |
|
Ice Box |
+4 |
+5 |
1st |
|
|
-11 |
-14 |
5th |
|
|
-10 |
-8 |
1st |
|
Interactif |
+10 |
+10 |
4th |
|
|
-1 |
-2 |
2nd |
|
|
-16 |
-17 |
2nd |
|
Jackson Bend |
-12 |
-11 |
2nd |
|
|
-11 |
-14 |
2nd |
|
|
-1 |
+6 |
2nd |
|
Line of David |
+4 |
+4 |
1st |
|
|
+6 |
+5 |
1st |
|
|
+3 |
-2 |
1st |
|
Lookin At Lucky |
-21 |
-21 |
3rd |
|
|
-6 |
-5 |
1st |
|
|
-12 |
-17 |
3rd |
|
Make Music For Me |
+10 |
+10 |
6th |
|
|
+5 |
+1 |
1st |
|
|
-12 |
-17 |
3rd |
|
Mission Impazable |
+1 |
+2 |
1st |
|
|
+7 |
+9 |
4th |
|
|
-8 |
-15 |
2nd |
|
Noble’s Promise |
+4 |
+4 |
5th |
|
|
-6 |
-5 |
2nd |
|
|
-12 |
-17 |
2nd |
|
Paddy O’Prado |
+10 |
+10 |
2nd |
|
|
+6 |
+3 |
1st |
|
|
+9 |
+3 |
3rd |
|
Rule |
+4 |
+5 |
3rd |
|
|
-1 |
-3 |
1st |
|
|
+1 |
+4 |
1st |
|
Sidney’s Candy |
-21 |
-21 |
1st |
|
|
-1 |
-2 |
1st |
|
|
-7 |
-11 |
1st |
|
Stately Victor |
+10 |
+10 |
1st |
|
|
+1 |
+3 |
5th |
|
|
-11 |
-15 |
8th |
|
Super Saver |
+4 |
+4 |
2nd |
|
|
+5 |
+4 |
3rd |
|
|
+7 |
+2 |
1st |
Thus, who among the remaining names - Awesome Act, Dean's Kitten, Dublin, Homeboykris, Ice Box Interactif, Make Music For Me, Mission Impazible, Noble's Promise, Paddy O' Prado, and Stately Victor - has shown the type of closing kick that will win the Run for the Roses? Here, I think it is wise to look at a few other factors - the distance of the race, its surface, the number of horses involved, and the races' final times. So, one more chart:
|
Horse |
Distance |
Place at 2nd Call |
Field Size |
Time |
|
Awesome Act |
1 1/16 on Turf |
4th trailing 2 |
10 |
1:43 and 4 |
|
Dean’s Kitten |
1 1/16 on Turf |
3rd trailing 1 1/2 |
9 |
1:46 and 1 |
|
Dublin |
6 Furlongs |
3rd trailing 2 |
11 |
1:09 and 2 |
|
Homeboykris |
1 Mile |
3rd trailing 1 |
6 |
1:35 |
|
Ice Box |
1 1/8 |
11th trailing 7 ¾ |
11 |
1:49 |
|
Interactif |
1 1/16 on Turf |
4th trailing 2 1/2 |
12 |
1:45 and 1 |
|
Make Music… |
1 Mile on Turf |
4th trailing 1 ¾ |
10 |
1:35 and 1 |
|
Mission Impaz.. |
1 1/8 |
7th trailing 4 ¾ |
13 |
1:50 and 1 |
|
Noble’s Promise |
1 1/16 on Syn |
1st |
14 |
1:43 |
|
Paddy O’Prado |
1 1/8 on Turf |
2nd trailing a head |
9 |
1:45 and 2 |
|
Stately Victor |
1 1/8 on Syn |
6th trailing 4 3/4 |
9 |
1:48 and 3 |
After making this chart, I am inclined to ignore the wins by everyone listed with the exceptions of Dublin, Ice Box, Mission Impazible, and Stately Victor. Why? Because everyone else was within two lengths of the lead at the second call. And these aren't even the horses we expect to be frontrunners! This will be a cavalry charge at the start. I don't think there is any way this race doesn't melt down in Spanish Chestnut/Giacomo-style.
All four of the horses left in this long-winded analysis might intrigue me.
Dublin has finished second and third in his last two races with above par race times, and he might just be the kind of plodding, same-speed-all-the-way-around-type that lopes past an exhausted field. In a way, I think it would be poetic justice for a son of Afleet Alex to win a Derby that melts down, since Alex, who I think was without a doubt the best horse in his Derby, lost it due to an insane pace. Also, wouldn't it be great if D.Wayne Lukas got to play Yoda to Pletcher's Skywalker, especially when Pletcher might train a quarter of the field? Lukas has won only four of his last 145 graded stakes races, though.
Ice Box, from Nick Zito's barn and owned by Robert Lapenta, the same connections as Belmont stunner Da'Tara, ran his highest figure last out and Zito is 25 percent with horses who won their last race. He also fits on earnings if you look only at this year's campaign.
Mission Impazible is one of those horse that just seems to be blooming. Three back he ran a BRIS SF of 102 on a sloppy six-furlong track and lost by a head. Good enough for Pletcher to move him into stakes company, where he was fourth in a mile race that saw Conveyance outlast Dublin. Then, bam...Louisana Derby winner with a 7th-to-1st move of the kind that wins races like this one. And the win came with only a BRIS SF of 97 attached. Does his form indicate a potential five-to-seven point bump?
And finally, there is Stately Victor. He is the kind of horse I typically toss because I find it easy to go against closers that got a dream pace set-up in their last out. But what if a horse can get that dream set-up twice in a row? If he wins, he's the second-coming of Giacomo. And I am not saying he can't win. His form cycle hints at a recent growth-spurt, and of the few trainers that seem to have figured out that synthetic-to-dirt angle, Mike Maker is one, to the tune of 35 percent wins and 66 percent in-the-money. And I love Alan Garcia...there is no way I will leave Stately Victor out of the top four holes.
Whew...sorry to go on so long, but I love this kind of stuff, and I'd be doing it for myself anyway. Why not share? I think it is good to talk these things out with other knowledgeable people. Sitting here, I am shocked to realize that this whole post required nary a mention of Eskendereya or Lookin' at Lucky. But all of their wins have come from slow races. Even factoring in the way Esky crushed a couple of fields, I just think this is a year where the top two favorites finish third or worse because of pace considerations, at which point they become prime candidates for Preakness victory!
Then again, perhaps I am going to be egregiously wrong...Lord knows, I have been before.



There are 5 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.