Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: All Hail David Luiz

BREEDERS' CUP 2011: Post Times and Wagering Menu

Photo

UPDATED: The chart below is updated with the current post times and wagering menu for the 2011 Breeders' Cup.

ORIGINAL POST: The Breeders' Cup released the scheduled post times and wagering menu for the 2011 championships at Churchill Downs on November 4th and 5th.   From the Breeders' Cup Ltd. press release:

LEXINGTON, Ky.  (September 22, 2011) - The Breeders' Cup announced today the wagering menu and post times for the 28th Breeders' Cup World Championships, to be held on Friday, November 4 and Saturday, November 5 at Churchill Downs in Louisville, Ky. This year's wagering menu on the 15 Breeders' Cup races features an abundance of wagering opportunities including two all Breeders' Cup Ultra Pick Sixes, 10-cent Superfectas, 50-cent Pick 4’s, rolling Pick 3's, a Ladies' Classic - Breeders' Cup Classic daily double and a new Pick 5 wager.

2011 Breeders' Cup Post Times Press Release

Below is a chart of the post times and wagering menu, along with some personal thoughts on the format:

Star-divide

 

Friday, November 4th
# Post Race Wagers
1 2:00pm OC 62k/N2X WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3, P5
2 2:30pm Allowance N1X WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3
3 3:00pm G3-Ack Ack WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3, P4
4 3:30pm Jimmy V. Stakes WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3
5 4:10pm BC Juvenile Sprint WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3, P6
6 4:50pm G2-BC Juvenile Fillies Turf WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3
7 5:30pm G1-BC Filly & Mare Sprint WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3, P4
8 6:10pm G1-BC Juvenile Fillies WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3
9 6:50pm G1-BC Filly & Mare Turf WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD
10 7:30pm G1-BC Ladies' Classic WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, HI-5
Saturday, November 5th
# Post Race Wagers
1 12:05pm Allowance N1X WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3, P5
2 12:35pm Dream Supreme WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3
3 1:20pm G2-BC Marathon WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3
4 2:02pm G1-BC Juvenile Turf WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3, P4
5 2:37pm G1-BC Sprint WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3
6 3:21pm G2-BC Turf Sprint WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3, P6
7 4:01pm G1-BC Dirt Mile WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3
8 4:45pm G1-BC Turf WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, P3, P4
9 5:25pm G1-BC Juvenile WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD
10 6:07pm G1-BC Mile WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD
11 7:00pm G1-BC Classic WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER, DD, HI-5
12 7:40pm G2-Chilukki WPS, EX, TRI, SUPER

 

ALL POST-TIMES ARE EASTERN TIME

  • Friday’s Pick 6 and Super Hi 5 may carryover to Saturday
  • Saturday’s Ultra Pick 6 and Super Hi 5 have a mandatory payout
  • The Pick 5 is a mandatory payout each day
  • Superfectas are a $0.10 minimum wager
  • Trifectas, Pick 3, Pick 4 and Pick 5 are $0.50 minimum wager
  • Win, Place, Show, Exacta and Pick 6 are $2 minimum wager
  • Daily Double and Super Hi 5 are $1 minimum bet
  • The Post Position Draw will take place on Monday, October 31
  • The Official race order will be set on October 26

Some personal thoughts on the race order and wagering menu:

-The new Pick-5 wagers will be similar to the ones in California in that they will encompass the first five races of the card, which on Breeders' Cup Friday and Saturday will include four and two non-BC races, respectively. I'm guessing the reason for the placement was to separate the wager from the Pick 6, but I'm not sure that is really necessary.

The Pick-5, given it's low minimum bet amount, is essentially the bankroll-limited player's Pick 6.  In other words, I don't think it's a direct competitor to the Pick 6, but an ancillary bet that attracts a different player. I've never played a BC Pick 6 (and only a few Pick 6s ever), but I would be much more likely to take a shot at the Pick 5 (depending on how the race sequence shakes out).  In short, I think the P5 probably would work in an "All BC" sequence, but I suppose we'll have to wait and see how the pools turn out during the first year.

-While the official race order won't be set until October 26th, it's unlikely we'll see a major change.

-The new Juvenile Sprint will go into "Filly Friday", which pushes the Marathon to Saturday for the first time.

-Given how strong the Ladies' Classic looks this year, it's a shame to see that race somewhat buried on the Friday card.  The 7:30 post time is 4:30 on the West Coast, not exactly a time when casual eyes will be watching a horse race.  While it's probably too difficult to put all 15 races on the same day (at least if they were to all take place at the same track), the two-day format still seems a bit too segregated for races like the Filly and Mare Turf, Juvenile Fillies, and Ladies' Classic. 

I'm not sure the "Filly Friday" thing has really worked at the Breeders' Cup; it's not the same as Oaks Day.  I think the Breeders' Cup would work as a one-day event, but one of two things would have to happen: reduce the post times to 25-30 minute intervals, or split the races between two tracks (perhaps one dirt and one turf).

Just looking at the post time intervals, if you went 30 minutes between each race, and started with no non-BC races, here's how Saturday would look.

12:35 Marathon
1:05 Juvenile Sprint
1:35 Juvenile Turf
2:05 Filly & Mare Sprint
2:35 Juvenile Fillies Turf
3:05 Juvenile
3:35 Turf Sprint
4:05 Juvenile Fillies
4:35 Sprint
5:05 Dirt Mile
5:35 Filly & Mare Turf
6:05 Mile
6:35 Turf
7:05 Ladies' Classic
7:35 Classic

 

To me, that works better.  It's one day, which eliminates the fragmenting of the races (and the filler of non-BC races at the start of the card), and it eliminates running six championship races on a weekday afternoon when people are at work.  It builds the day better and offers an opportunity to put Pick 3s, 4s, 5s and 6s all within the Breeders' Cup format. The first race of the day is early on the West Coast (9:30am), but that is no different than some Breeders' Cups in the past, and you could always move the first race back another half-hour or hour and push the Classic into the 8-8:30pm range, giving it a prime time television audience.  I know some people frown on night racing, but we live in a TV world.

There are clearly factors I'm not privy to that play into the decision of the Breeders' Cup to split the event, but as a fan, I wish the event would return to one, super-sized day of top-class racing.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Filly Friday

Trying to make anything like the Kentucky Oaks is a huge mistake. That is a very specific phenomenon/event that is tied directly to Derby Day. Now if Breeder’s Cup were to make Churchill it’s exclusive home, I could really see this taking off. You basically market it as a second Derby Day (more or less) and really push Louisville to embrace the two days like they do in May.

The Oaks day is the second best attended day of racing in the country (consistently, at least), and since Kentucky is a unique venue for horse racing, you theoretically should be able to push closer to the BC Classic day of racing’s attendance, IF YOU DON’T KEEP MOVING THE BC AROUND THE COUNTRY.

But I’m obviously biased towards Churchill. That’s where my horses run.

by TFTribe on Sep 22, 2011 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I think you're right...

it’s next to impossible to pull off that Oaks Day-feel for any other event. Even Pimlico and Belmont haven’t been able to replicate that for their big days. Plus, it seems really counter-intuitive to take six top quality races – especially ones like the FM Turf, Juv Fillies and Distaff – and stick them on a weekday afternoon. That really limits the exposure, in my opinion.

I wouldn’t mind CD as the permanent home: it’s somewhat centrally located (about as much as you can find in racing), can handle the crowds, is in the heart of horse country in the North America… and perhaps the Friday portion of the event (if it continues in the same format) could grow more at that location.

I also don’t mind a true rotation of tracks, but I think if you’re going to rotate it, then rotate it (which hasn’t really happened the last five years). I’d love to see Monmouth get another shot since they had their year really damped by that awful, awful weather.

The cool thing is that I think the BC still has lots of room to grow and lots of options in which to do that. It just depends on how they want to structure it.

"A bad day at the track is better than a good day at the office."

And Down The Stretch They Come | @PressThePace

by Matt Gardner on Sep 22, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree

Move it through a Monmouth-Belmont-Hollywood(or whatever in FL), Churchill, SA, etc. But you have to keep it on dirt, in my opinion, so you exclude places like Arlington, Delmar, etc.

Or give it a permanente home. I say permanent at Churchill. TV ratings are generally better for things that have packed, and Louisville gives you the best shot at filling the iconic track in the US to the gills.

by TFTribe on Sep 22, 2011 2:00 PM EDT reply actions  

I think if it's gonna have a home anywhere

It’s gonna be at Santa Anita. However, I don’t think it’s ever gonna be a permanent thing.

by LAEagle on Sep 22, 2011 8:58 PM EDT reply actions  

The best thing with SA is the weather...

You know it’s going to be good and the track will be fast. I think that’s a huge bonus.

"A bad day at the track is better than a good day at the office."

And Down The Stretch They Come | @PressThePace

by Matt Gardner on Sep 22, 2011 10:10 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Locations

When you really think about it, there isn’t a ton of locations currently available for the BC, if you’re looking for dirt main tracks and big grandstands. SA, CD, and BEL are the standards. And Monmouth seems to be set-up pretty good to hold a BC. After that, we run into a lot of issues:

-Woodbine is synthetic.
-Arlington is synthetic.
-Gulfstream’s grandstand is really small now.
-Aqueduct hasn’t been used for a BC in years. Same for Hollywood (which also has a synthetic track).
-Del Mar and Keeneland are synthetic.
-Tampa? Dirt but a small grandstand; could possible work if temp. seating is brought in but that probably isn’t ideal. Good weather, though.
-Lone Star? Has held one already but needed temp. seating to do it. Good weather on their side.
-Fair Grounds? Small grandstand.

The best tracks in terms of facilities are probably Woodbine and Arlington (especially Arlington), but both of those now being synthetic is a major issue. After that, there isn’t a lot of options these days.

So the question is: how important is having a big grandstand to accommodate a lot of people to the Breeders’ Cup? If that continues to be a major factor in location, then there really is only three tracks that really fit the bill (and are dirt): Belmont, Santa Anita and Churchill Downs.

"A bad day at the track is better than a good day at the office."

And Down The Stretch They Come | @PressThePace

by Matt Gardner on Sep 23, 2011 11:04 AM EDT reply actions  

off topic

The Tiznow doc they’re running on tvg now is sweet… USA! Breeders Cup!

Never trust a man who doesn't drink.

by Noir Jim Tressel on Nov 2, 2011 11:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community for Horse Racing and Handicapping. If you are new to the sport, check out the New Student Orientation post.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Bulldog_logo_small
2012 Casual Preakness Stakes Preview
Ascot6_small
2000 Guineas Result: Camelot Edges Hermival And French Fifteen At The Wire
Bulldog_logo_small
2012 Casual Kentucky Derby Preview
Ulysses_everett_mcgill_small
Gulfstream Park Handicap-Grade 2
Small
Weekend Contest 3/10/2012
Small
Weekend Contest 3/3/2012
Small
WEEKEND CONTEST 2/25/2012

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Track Management

Ascot6_small Matt Gardner

Handicappers

Standing_at_the_station_small JP Fanshawe

Wm-w-feathers1_small TFTribe

Rufwater_small Jared L. Christopher